Casino Cautions: Royal Dutch Casino Again
Published: Friday, March 18, 2005 Online-Casinos.com
CASINO CAUTIONS
A dubious sort of record for Royal Dutch Casino
Royal
Dutch Casino management reached a dubious record low with their sixth consecutive
appearance in InfoPowa's Casino Cautions this week.
For sheer arrogance
and duplicity, this Costa Rican organisation is hard to beat in our opinion, and
they were still tap dancing around the issue of payment to a player who has now
been trying to extract a $ 2 700 legitimate payout from this miserable outfit
for nine months.
Two weeks ago these folks finally agreed to unconditionally
pay the long-suffering player and asked for his bank details which were promptly
supplied, using the mediating assistance of Bryan Bailey, the Casinomeister.
Ten days later, the player still having not received a sous, Bailey started
leaning on the RDC's Angelo Vitorino, a singularly smarmy fellow with a penchant
for assurances that RDC is professional and honest. Vitorino then indulged himself
in an exchange of emails with what is widely believed to be a non-person called
Jean Phillipe Le Blanc, going to extraordinary lengths to convince readers of
his emails that this *person* was the former owner of the casino who had at last
agreed to pay the player.
Incredibly, there is now a further delay in
proceedings whilst an *agreement* that is "just a formality" is devised
by Le Blanc for the player to sign - the first any of those involved had heard
of in this ridiculously delayed payout where the player has made it clear that
he is in no mood for "conditions".
Strangely (but perhaps predictably)
there are indications that all of this email traffic is taking place from one
particular computer!
STOP PRESS: As we went to press this week
the player had been paid only $1700 of the $2 700 due amid further startling behaviour
from this casino.
First, it's staff submitted an *agreement* which required
the player to publish glowing testimonials - after nine months of being harried
from pillar to post! He declined, which resulted in more debate, leading to a
claim that the alleged *old owner* had defrauded the alleged *new owner* on selling
the casino, but would now pay up.
Therein lay yet another complication,
with the casino asking for a PrePaidATM account (having previously requested and
been given bank and Neteller details)
Finally, the casino tried for the
second time to marginalise the player's mediator by approaching him direct and
attempting to change his mind on that glowing testimonial. Adding insult to injury,
the charlatan who made the call asked the player to open an account at Royal Dutch
Casino!
Players need to seriously watch this drama unfolding as an indication
of the manner in which Royal Dutch Casino conducts it's business.
